Hutchinson v. St. Louis & Meramec River Railroad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the existence of a contested fact is more probable than its nonexistence”
• stating that \the existence of a contested fact is more probable than its nonexistence\
• stating that “the existence of a contested fact is more probable than its nonexistence”
• stating that “the existence of a contested fact is more probable than its nonexistence”
• stating that “the existence of a contested fact is more probable than its nonexistence”
• stating that “the existence of a contested fact is more probable than its nonexistence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).