Hutchinson v. Peacock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing engagement with the flow of interstate commerce from participation in independent transactions
• distinguishing engagement with the flow of interstate commerce from participation in independent transactions
• analyzing (1) whether the class of workers “as a 6 workers” are “engaged in . . . interstate commerce” within the meaning of the statute. 9 U.S.C. §1. The Drivers, relying on Morris v. McComb, 332 U.S. 422 (1947
• noting a “preliminary injunction pending arbitration is ordinarily temporary emergency relief that extends only until the arbitrator itself can decide whether to award relief.” (quoting Braintree Lab’ys, Inc. v. Citigroup Glob. Mkts. Inc., 622 F.3d 36, 40 n.4 (1st Cir. 2010)
• noting a “preliminary injunction pending arbitration is ordinarily temporary emergency relief that extends only until the arbitrator itself can decide whether to award relief.” (quoting Braintree Lab’ys, Inc. v. Citigroup Glob. Mkts. Inc., 622 F.3d 36, 40 n.4 (1st Cir. 2010)
• “Because we find that the FAA applies, we need not examine the role of the Massachusetts Uniform Arbitration Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).