Hutchinson v. Kenney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that city had to “prove” it had a compelling interest and that the remedy was narrowly tailored
• finding government’s adjusting score cut-off to ensure certain number of black candidates qualified “destroys” the government’s claim that the plan is flexible
• “Under [strict scrutiny], [the defendant] must prove that it had a compelling state interest when it enacted its plan, and that the plan is narrowly tailored to further that compelling state interest.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).