Hutchinson v. Irvin's Trustee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that courts should interpret the removal statute narrowly, “resolving any doubt in favor of the plaintiff’s choice of forum in state court”
• courts should interpret the removal statute narrowly, “resolving any doubt in favor of the plaintiff's choice of forum in state court.”
• “In considering a motion for remand, the court must examine the plaintiffs’ complaint at the time of the defendant’s removal and assume the truth of all factual allegations contained within the original complaint.”
• accepting factual allegations as true on motion to remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).