Hutchinson v. Hubbard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no jury trial is available for an age-discrimination action where R.C. 4101.17 stated that “the court” would make findings and order an appropriate remedy
• concluding that the “requirement in R.C. 1701.85 (B) that ‘[t]he court shall thereupon make a finding as to the fair cash value of a share’ dispenses with the requirement of a jury trial in such special statutory proceeding” (Emphasis added.)
• there is no right to a jury trial under the Ohio Constitution in a claim brought under the age-discrimination statute, because the statute created a new civil right for which no common-law action had provided relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).