Hutchinson J. Kroeger v. United States Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it would not be error to decline to apply collateral estoppel even when its requirements are met
• finding that collateral estoppel is appropriate when, among other things, an issue is identical to that involved in the prior action
• finding that collateral estoppel is appropriate when, among other things, an issue is identical to that involved in the prior action
• finding that collateral estoppel is appropriate when, among other things, an issue is identical to that involved in the prior action
• finding that collateral estoppel is appropriate when, among other things, an issue is identical to that involved in the prior action
• stating that collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, is appropriate when, among other things, the identical issue was actually litigated and decided in a prior action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).