· 5/31/1932
Hutchins v. Wardman
Citations
- 59 F.2d 867
- 61 App. D.C. 192
- 1932 U.S. App. LEXIS 3469
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that plaintiff’s spoliation claim, to the extent it was cognizable, was premature because plaintiff had not yet suffered a diminution in value of her claims
- discussing record-keeping standards required of licensed physicians
- rejecting spoliation claim without underlying claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.