Hutchins v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, notwithstanding the plaintiffs adequate prima fa-cie case, the defendant proved its defense that the differences were legitimately based on factors other than sex
• stating that, under the EPA, the defendant bears the burden “to prove that the disparities complained of were based on ... a factor other than sex”
• noting that length of service, education, or experience are factors other than sex upon which an employer may base salary decisions
• “A differential that is based on education or experience is a factor other than sex recognized by the Equal Pay Act.”
• “A differential that is based on education or experience is a factor other than sex recognized by the Equal Pay Act.”
• the plaintiff made out a prima facie case of sex-based wage discrimination, where she presented evidence that twelve male comparators were paid more than she was, even though eight male comparators were paid the same as the plaintiff

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).