Skip to main content
· 4/4/2006

Hutchings Ex Rel. Hutchings v. Roling

Citations

  • 193 S.W.3d 334
  • 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 413
  • 2006 WL 851824

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding claim of error regarding exclusion of evidence is unreviewable and is deemed abandoned where neither point relied on nor argument portion of the brief under the point identifies the excluded evidence
  • matters first raised in argument portion of brief and not included in point relied on are not preserved for appellate review
  • “[T]he trial court must consider the question of substantial justification on the record made in the agency proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kathianne Knaup Crane

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.