Husyev v. Mukasey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “where there is no explanation for the petitioner’s delay, [petitioner’s] 364-day wait after his lawful nonimmigrant status expired is not a reasonable period”
• holding that petitioner’s claim to “extraordinary circumstances” was a question of law and that we therefore have jurisdiction to review it
• holding that petitioner's claim to \extraordinary circumstances\ was a question of law and that we therefore have jurisdiction to review it
• holding that a delay longer than six months is presumptively unreasonable “[i]n the absence of any special considerations”
• concluding that application of the extraordinary- circumstances standard in an asylum statute was a mixed question of law and fact
• holding that a 364- day delay in filing an asylum application after the expiration of an alien’s lawful nonimmigrant status was not a “reasonable period”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).