Huston v. Harrington
Citations
- 58 Wash. 51
- 107 P. 874
- 1910 Wash. LEXIS 887
Syllabus
<p>Specific Performance—Contracts—Uncertainty—Principal- and Agent. A contract whereby defendant agreed to sell certain corporate stock to the plaintiff, or to whomsoever he may direct, for the sum of not less than $30,000 and as much more as it may be sold for to any other person than the plaintiff, is one of agency, in which the price is left uncertain where no sale was made to a third person, and therefore cannot be specifically enforced.</p> <p>Same—Contracts—Confidential Relation. A contract by defendant to sell to plaintiff certain corporate stock will not be specifically enforced where the plaintiff was acting as defendant’s confidential agent in sole charge of the business, and failed to fully inform the defendant of the condition of the property and of an increase in its rental value, and part of the tender to defendant was from money belonging to the corporation paid in advance upon such increased rentals.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the court sentenced the defendant to four additional five-year terms for four convictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Crow, Discussed, Dunbar, Mount, Parker, Rudkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.