Skip to main content
· 10/30/1975

Huston v. Campanini

Citations

  • 346 A.2d 258
  • 464 Pa. 147
  • 1975 Pa. LEXIS 1042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting absence of indispensable party goes to court’s jurisdiction and issue may be raised sua sponte
  • persons to whom vendors allegedly sold restaurant after declaring forfeiture and repossession from plaintiffs were possible bona fide purchasers, and, therefore, indispensible parties
  • in buyers’ action to compel specific performance of contract to purchase real estate, individuals to whom the sellers averred they had already transferred property should have been joined as indispensable parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.