Huston v. Brookpark Skateland Social Club, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• examining a policy's use of the terms fire, arson, and vandalism, and concluding that \[a]ccording to this policy . . . arson is different from vandalism\
• interpreting policy’s use of terms fire, arson, and vandalism to mean that under the language of that policy, “arson is different from vandalism”
• \We review the trial court's ruling on evidentiary matters before it on summary judgment for abuse of discretion.\
• “We review the trial court’s ruling on evidentiary matters before it on summary judgment for abuse of discretion.”
• “the question (at least in Washington) is whether the' average person purchasing insurance would believe that he or'she assumed the risk of an arson fire under an all-risk policy where the policy excluded coverage for vandalism- The answer to that question’ is ‘no.’ ”
• assessing an order excluding an affidavit as violating ER 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).