Skip to main content
· 7/17/1980

Hust v. Hust

Citations

  • 295 N.W.2d 316
  • 1980 N.D. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing cases in which this court upheld a custody award of a minor child to the grandparents
  • stating that once a child is found to be deprived, “the parents’ fundamental right to the child’s custody was subrogated to the court’s authority to make a custody determination in the best interests of the child pursuant to Section 27-20-30, N.D.C.C.”
  • reversing an award of custody to a child’s grandparents as part of a divorce, because the district court failed to find exceptional circumstances justifying the award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vande Walle, Erickstad, Pederson, Paulson, Sand

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.