Skip to main content
· 7/1/1871

Hussey v. Castle

Citations

  • 41 Cal. 239

Syllabus

<p>Fraudulent Conveyance by Husband to Wife.—There is no legal presumption that a conveyance of land, made by the husband to the wife, is fraudulent as against a judgment creditor of the husband, whose judgment was recovered after the conveyance.</p> <p>Community Property.—There is no legal presumption that land, the separate property of the husband, conveyed by him to the wife in consideration of money, the separate property of the wife, becomes, after such conveyance, the community properly of the husband and wife.</p> <p>Ante-Muptial Contract.—An ante-nuptial verbal contract, which is executed by the parties after marriage', cannot be assailed by the parties thereto, or by third parties, on the ground that it was not in writing.</p>

Judges: Sprague

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.