Husseini v. Husseini

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging Watega and noting that courts should only exercise discretion to authorize pre-division sales in “exceptional circumstances”
• providing “the preservation of marital assets” as an example of a pressing reason to order a pre-division sale
• invoking Rule 521 where “it would [have] be[en] unjust and unrealistic to expect a pro se litigant to have . . . ma[d]e a timely appeal”
• “[A] sale of property should not be ordered absent a pressing reason, such as the preservation of marital assets or significant gains to the marital estate.”
• “For an issue of property division to be reserved, AS 25.24.155 requires that the court make a finding ‘that the interests of a party opposing the motion will not be jeopardized by the delay or reservation.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).