Hussein, Abdullah v. Taylor Farms TN, Inc., d/b/a Taylor Fresh Foods, Inc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Finnegan does not control where the removed union employee held an elected position
• holding that removal of an elected union official by a trustee because the official opposed a proposed dues increase was a violation of Title I of the LMRDA
• holding that an officer had stated a cause of action under § 411(a)(2) because retaliatory removal from office constituted a price paid for the exercise of his membership right of free speech
• holding that an officer had stated a cause of action under § 411(a)(2) because retaliatory removal from office constituted a price paid for the exercise of his membership right of free speech
• holding that an officer had stated a cause of action under S 411(a)(2) because retaliatory removal from office constituted a price paid for the exercise of his membership right of free speech
• reasoning that “had Congress contemplated such a result, we would expect to find some discussion of it in the text of the [Act] or its legislative history”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).