Huskins v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “the absence of ‘an obligation imposed by law to pay any tax’ weighs in favor of characterizing the remittance as a deposit...”
• “Therefore, under Rev. Proc. 84-58, it would be impossible for the Estate to ‘designate’ the remittance as a payment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Huskins v. United States

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Huskins v. United States
  Federal Circuit· 2007-06-25