Federal Claims· 3/16/2007
Huskins v. United States
Citations
- 75 Fed. Cl. 659
- 99 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1728
- 2007 U.S. Claims LEXIS 77
- 2007 WL 851208
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that “the absence of ‘an obligation imposed by law to pay any tax’ weighs in favor of characterizing the remittance as a deposit...”
- “Therefore, under Rev. Proc. 84-58, it would be impossible for the Estate to ‘designate’ the remittance as a payment.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Braden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Boensel v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-08-05· cited 30×
- Principal Life Insurance v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2010-11-12· cited 7×
- Winford v. United StatesW.D. Louisiana· 2012-08-24· cited 2×
- Faisal Ahmed v. Commissioner of IRSThird Circuit· 2023-04-07· cited 2×
- Nicholas Acoustics & Specialty Co., Inc. v. United StatesS.D. Mississippi· 2010-04-16· cited 1×
- Winford v. United StatesW.D. Louisiana· 2013-09-09
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court· 1986-03-26· cited 58,760×
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court· 1976-05-03· cited 3,918×
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1967-02-17· cited 1,076×
- Sorenson v. Secretary of the TreasurySupreme Court· 1986-04-22· cited 355×
- Rosenman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-01-29· cited 255×
- Moden v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-04-15· cited 245×
- Todd v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2004-10-05· cited 160×
- Novartis Corporation v. Ben Venue Laboratories, Inc., and Bedford LaboratoriesFederal Circuit· 2001-11-07· cited 152×
- Iqbal M. Khan v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2000-01-24· cited 131×
- Stratos Mobile Networks Usa, LLC v. United States, and Comsat CorporationFederal Circuit· 2000-05-26· cited 125×
- New York Life Insurance Company v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 1997-09-26· cited 112×
- Riley & Ephriam Construction Co. v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2005-05-18· cited 76×
- Baral v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-02-22· cited 56×
- Thomas v. Mercantile Nat. Bank at DallasFifth Circuit· 1953-06-18· cited 55×
- Busser v. United StatesThird Circuit· 1942-08-28· cited 43×
- State of California v. United StatesFederal Circuit· 2001-11-27· cited 42×
- Charles Leich and Company v. The United StatesCourt of Claims· 1964-03-13· cited 39×
- James R. Cohen and Joanne D. Cohen v. The United StatesFederal Circuit· 1993-06-04· cited 39×
Other cases named Huskins v. United States
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.