Huskins v. Huskins

Syllabus

Amanda Leigh Huskins and Jay R. Huskins (collectively, the Huskinses) appeal the circuit court's order granting Mungo Homes, LLC's (Mungo's) motion to dismiss and compel arbitration. The Huskinses argue the circuit court erred in (1) finding the limitations period contained in the arbitration provision was not one-sided, oppressive, and unconscionable (2) finding the arbitration provision applied mutually to Mungo and the Huskinses (3) failing to consider the one-sided and oppressive terms of a limited warranty provision in determining whether the arbitration agreement was unconscionable and (4) granting the motion to dismiss the Huskinses' claims involving the limited warranty provision even though it concluded the arbitration provision did not include claims arising under the limited warranty provision. We affirm the circuit court's order as modified.