Huse v. Den

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that accomplice’s tes- timony was sufficiently corroborated because, among other things, phone records showed that the appellant and his accom- plice were in contact before the crimes and in the hours after- wards
• “Slight evidence from an extraneous source identifying the accused as a participant in the criminal act is sufficient corroboration of the accomplice to support a verdict.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).