Huschak v. Gray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that petitioner’s Double Jeopardy claim should have been raised before the military courts rather than the AFC&PB and thus was considered waived
• noting that the constitutional protection against self-incrimination is not implicated where the result of non-compliance is a parole revocation rather than new “criminal liability”
• noting that the constitutional protection against self-incrimination is not implicated where the result of non-compliance is a parole revocation rather than new “criminal liability”
• “Inmates placed on MSR are deemed ‘as if on parole’ ... [and] are under the supervision of a U.S. Probation Officer.” (citation omitted)
• “It does not matter whether the conditions were voluntary or involuntary ... [since] some parole systems are automatic.”
• “Persons asserting a Fifth Amendment privilege are not exonerated from answering merely because they declare that in so doing they would incriminate themselves[;] their say-so does not of itself establish the hazards of incrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).