Husband R v. Wife R

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a clearly established law should not be 24 defined “‘at a high level of generality,’ but instead ‘the clearly established law must be 25 “particularized” to the facts of the case’”
• “[G]overnment officials may be immune from liability where they act in reliance on 24 a valid court order.”
• “This immunity applies even where parole officers ‘impos[e] allegedly unconstitutional parole conditions.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).