Skip to main content

Hurtado v. State

Citations

  • 760 So. 2d 279
  • 2000 WL 726491

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • confirming that a trial court has the discretion to consider the public’s interest in the fair and orderly administration of justice in denying a defendant’s request for a different attorney
  • affirming the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s motion to discharge counsel made on the eve of trial and where the trial court found the motion was motivated by a desire to delay the proceedings
  • affirming the trial court's denial of the defendant's request on the eve of trial to substitute private counsel when trial court found that the request was made in bad faith and for the sake of arbitrary delay
  • affirming the trial court's denial of the defendant's request on the eve of trial to substitute private counsel when trial court found that the request was made in bad faith and for the sake of arbitrary delay
  • trial court did not abuse discretion in denying request for new counsel on grounds that “[defendant’s] request was made in bad faith and for the sake of arbitrary delay”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.