Skip to main content
· 10/30/2006

Hurt v. U.S. House of Representatives

Citations

  • 204 F. App'x 899

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the district court properly concluded that it had no jurisdiction to review [the] habeas petition requesting that the court vacate and reverse the BIA’s . . . 2003 decision denying her motion to reopen”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.