Hurt v. Newcomb

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering “whether the individual’s duties are 18 akin to a regular employee’s duties” in determining “whether an individual is 24 1 jointly employed by two or more entities”
• “We have long recognized that the imminent destruction of evidence may constitute an exigency excusing the failure to procure a warrant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).