Skip to main content
· 8/3/2010

Hurt v. Lappin

Citations

  • 729 F. Supp. 2d 186
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77852
  • 2010 WL 3022560

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing premature FTCA claim which plaintiff had submitted to the BOP less than two months prior to filing civil action
  • “Even though the six-month period has now expired, the relevant analysis is whether [plaintiff] had exhausted his administrative remedy at the time he filed his complaint.”
  • “Even though the six-month period has now expired, the relevant analysis is whether [plaintiff] had exhausted his administrative remedy at the time he filed his complaint.”
  • granting defendant’s motion to dismiss without prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rosemary M. Collyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.