Hurt v. District of Columbia

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the rule requires unanimity from those defendants who have been served” (emphasis added)
• finding that the 30-day period was extended to the 24 next court day under Rule 6(a)
• “Nonetheless, removal to federal court additionally requires a timely demonstration of consent from all served defendants within thirty days of service of the complaint, under the widely recognized “rule of unanimity.”
• “Nonetheless, removal to federal court additionally requires a timely demonstration of consent from all served defendants within thirty days of service of the complaint, under the widely recognized “rule of unanimity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).