Skip to main content
· 11/12/1928

Hurst v. Hilderbrandt

Citations

  • 10 S.W.2d 491
  • 178 Ark. 337
  • 1928 Ark. LEXIS 435

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • appropriation by county from county road fund to aid improvement district in construction of streets surrounding university campus not unlawful as expenditure of county funds for state purpose, where roads were part of the county's highway system
  • upholding a county appropriation for street improvements within a city
  • upholding a county appropriation for street improvements within a city

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McHaney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.