· 11/12/1928
Hurst v. Hilderbrandt
Citations
- 10 S.W.2d 491
- 178 Ark. 337
- 1928 Ark. LEXIS 435
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- appropriation by county from county road fund to aid improvement district in construction of streets surrounding university campus not unlawful as expenditure of county funds for state purpose, where roads were part of the county's highway system
- upholding a county appropriation for street improvements within a city
- upholding a county appropriation for street improvements within a city
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McHaney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.