Hurst v. Estate of Jackson
Citations
- 14 Teiss. 364
- 1917 La. App. LEXIS 72
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>Articles 126, 127 & 128 of the Civil Code do not authorize a wife to borrow money for the use of her husband, and the only effect of the Judge’s certificate is to shift the burden of proof. Without that certificate the creditor must prove that the loan inured to the wife’s separate benefit; but with the certificate the burden of proof then lies upon the wife to show affirmatively that the loan inured to the benefit of her husband and that the creditor knew that fact when the loan was made.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that failure to object to excessive leading questions by the state during direct examination did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel
- holding that a trial court's error in permitting alternate jurors to remain during jury deliberations, in violation of former Crim.R. 24(F), was not cause for automatic reversal
- limiting aggravating factors to statutory aggravating factors that have been charged and proved beyond a reasonable doubt
- limiting aggravating factors to statutory aggravating factors that have been charged and proved beyond a reasonable doubt
- stating \[t]he trial court clearly erred * * * in allowing the alternate jurors to remain present during deliberations\
- declining to find ineffective assistance of counsel from an attorney's failure to object to the state's excessive leading questioning
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: John, Paul
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.