Hurst & Co. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the mere misapplication of the law is not sufficient to vacate an arbitration award
• noting that \the `twin goals of arbitration'\ are \`settling disputes efficiently and avoiding long and expensive litigation'\
• noting that courts are not free to reject an arbitral award simply because \they would have reached a different conclusion if presented with the same facts\
• noting that “the ‘twin goals of arbitration’” are “ ‘settling disputes efficiently and avoiding long and expensive litigation’ ”
• noting that vacatur is not justified by a court’s belief that an arbitrator misapplied the law
• noting that courts are not free to reject an arbitral award simply because \they would have reached a different conclu- sion if presented with the same facts\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).