Skip to main content
· 1/16/2004

Hurshel Williams v. Larry Rhoades Matt Fontaine

Citations

  • 354 F.3d 1101
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 600
  • 2004 WL 67841

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that this court can consider claims not specifically excluded by a COA
  • “On habeas review, state appellate court findings – including those that interpret unclear or ambiguous trial court rulings – are entitled to the same presumption of corrections that we afford trial court findings” pursuant to section 2254(e)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Farris, Trott, Weiner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.