· 1/13/2009
Hursh v. Director of Revenue
Citations
- 272 S.W.3d 914
- 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 172
- 2009 WL 62946
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘A person’s act in not blowing into the testing machine and by blowing around the mouthpiece to prevent the necessary quantity of air to proceed into the machine may be considered a refusal.’ ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dandurand, Lowenstein, Smart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.