Skip to main content
· 6/11/1954

Hurr v. Johnston

Citations

  • 242 Minn. 329
  • 65 N.W.2d 193
  • 1954 Minn. LEXIS 649

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a “new trial on all the issues here [would] be in the interests of justice” because “[b]oth sides are entitled to a fair, impartial, conscientious consideration of all the evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Christianson, Nelson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.