Huron Group, Inc. v. Pataki

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[A] party may not protest if he was not a participant in a specific conversation.\
• “[A] party may not protest if he was not a participant in a specific conversation.”
• particular speakers knew they could be overheard, and thus had no justifiable expectation of privacy
• particular speakers knew they could be overheard, and thus had no justifiable expectation of privacy
• “when part of a communication is carried to or from a landline telephone, the entire conversation is a wire communication”
• “[t]he definition of wire communication [in the 1968 federal wiretap legislation] is not free from ambiguity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).