Hurley v. Stuart Fine Foods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting move for financial reasons is not an improper motivation where there was no evidence that claimant's move was motivated by desire to avoid work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Money v. Flowers
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-05-02· cited 81×
• Stewart v. CRS Rinker Materials Corp.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-10-03· cited 10×
• Wood v. United States Department of Labor
  First Circuit· 1997-05-08· cited 7×
• AMS STAFF LEASING, INC. v. Arreola
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-01-31

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• B & J WINDOWS v. Sweitzer
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-08· cited 8×
• Genelus v. Boran, Craig, Schreck Const. Co.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-06· cited 6×
• Department of Transp. v. Montero
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-08-06· cited 5×
• Hyatt Regency Westshore v. Robinson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-12· cited 5×
• Lykes Bros., Inc. v. Jackson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-12-21· cited 4×
• Travelodge and Royal Ins. v. Pierre-Gilles
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-10-15· cited 4×
• Donahue v. CTL Distribution
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-11-19· cited 1×