Hurley v. State Road Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that a defendant's unpreserved claim that the sentencing court relied on an impermissible factor at sentencing is reviewed for plain error
• explaining that evidence supporting a sentence must have \sufficient indicia of trustworthiness\ to prove it's probably accurate (quoting United States v. Rodríguez, 336 F.3d 67, 71 (1st Cir. 2003)
• \This failure to object constitutes a waiver of [the defendant's] right to challenge the information contained in the PSR.\
• “[T]he sale of virtual chips for cash on a secondary market violates 20 the Terms of Use. The virtual chips cannot constitute a ‘thing of value’ based on this prohibited 21 use.”
• \A court . . . cannot simply presume that past charges resolved without conviction are attributable to flawed or lax prosecutorial or judicial systems rather than the defendant's innocence.\ (citation omitted, cleaned up, and new alteration added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).