Hurley v. State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We conclude Hurley’s deferred adjudication was not a conviction or finding of guilt for purposes of [A]rticle 42.08 and [S]ection 3.03(b).”
• “[W]e conclude [appellant’s] deferred adjudication was not a conviction or finding of guilt for purposes of [A]rticle 42.08 and [S]ection 3.03(b).”
• “[T]he trial court abused its discretion in ordering the deferred adjudication to begin after Hurley served his sentence.”
• “[T]he trial court abused its discretion in ordering the deferred adjudication to begin after [appellant] served his sentence.”
• “We modify the trial court’s order deferring adjudication of guilt to delete that portion requiring [appellant’s] deferred[-]adjudication community supervision to begin after [appellant’s] sentence for indecency with a child ceases to operate.”
• “We modify the trial court’s order deferring adjudication of guilt to delete that portion requiring Hurley’s deferred adjudication community supervision to begin after Hurley’s sentence for indecency with a child ceases to operate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).