Hurley v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under prior version of Section 35-31.5-2- 221.5, defendant’s finger qualified as “object”
• holding defendant’s finger constituted “an object” under a statute criminalizing sexual penetration “by an object”
• holding defendant’s finger constituted “an object” under a statute criminalizing sexual penetration “by an object”
• noting that 7 deviate sexual conduct is defined in part as the penetration of the sex organ of a person by an object, and holding that a finger is an object for the purposes of the statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• William G. Culler v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-04-24
• M.A. v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-05-22
• State of Iowa v. Zacarias
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-04-23
• State of Iowa v. Zachary Tyler Zacarias
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2021-04-23

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Stewart v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1990-06-05· cited 69×
• McCann v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-24· cited 31×
• Harwood v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 1990-06-20· cited 14×
• Miller v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1989-09-25· cited 2×
• Galloway v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1988-10-17· cited 1×