Supreme Court of Florida· 10/15/1975
Hurley v. State
Citations
- 322 So. 2d 506
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the \Florida Rules for Traffic Courts evince a clear intent that the uniform traffic citation constitute the charging document\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: England
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Maddox v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2006-01-12· cited 51×
- Spears v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-09-23· cited 28×
- Wooten v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-04-07· cited 17×
- Ivory v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-03· cited 8×
- State v. WitcherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-06-25· cited 6×
- Crossley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-05-28· cited 2×
- State v. BradyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-06-27
- State v. RahnLee County Court· 1983-08-22
- State v. PerrineLee County Court· 1987-01-13
- State v. PlautVolusia County Court· 1987-03-30
- State v. IvoryFlorida Circuit Courts· 1991-03-11
- Deel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-12-23
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.