Skip to main content

Hurley v. Slingerland

Citations

  • 461 So. 2d 282
  • 10 Fla. L. Weekly 125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Next, appellant argues that the transaction was usurious. We disagree. The interest provided for upon default did not constitute a usurious amount.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Hurley v. Slingerland

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.