Skip to main content
· 10/8/1953

Hurley v. Lindsay, Superintendent of Lorton Reformatory

Citations

  • 207 F.2d 410
  • 1953 U.S. App. LEXIS 4484

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that appellant’s remedy was a motion in the sentencing court
  • “If there was any irregularity in the sentence or orders under which appellant was held, . . .appellant’s remedy was a motion in the sentencing court under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, not a petition for a declaratory judgment in another court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parker, Soper, Dobie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.