· 2/23/1932
Hurley v. Kincaid
Citations
- 285 U.S. 95
- 52 S. Ct. 267
- 76 L. Ed. 637
- 1932 U.S. LEXIS 778
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting a request to “enjoin the carrying out of any work” on a flood control project because the Tucker Act provided the plaintiff with “a plain, adequate, and complete remedy at law”
- equitable relief is unavailable if plaintiff has a remedy under the Tucker Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brandeis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.