Hurley v. Agrico Chemical Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the “holding [in Jones v. Gerwens ] was questioned in” Jones v. Bessemer Carraway
• reasoning that an opinion that discrimination motivated an employment action is not an admissible lay opinion
• observing the sham affidavit rule “applies with equal force to declarations.”
• striking contradictory portions of plaintiffs declaration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).