Hurley Constr. Co. v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that insured's counsel argued that existing complaint for conspiracy might be amended to plead property damage
• affirming summary judgment to insurer because third party action alleged no facts indicating a potential for coverage; there was no accidental “occurrence” within the plain meaning of the policy
• “[T]he insured may not speculate about unpled third party claims to manufacture coverage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).