Hurd v. West

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a TDIU claim was a form of increased rating claim by applying increased rating effective date regulatory provisions to a TDIU claim
• when the RO requests additional evidence and the appellant does not respond within one year, the claim is considered abandoned under 38 C.F.R. § 3.158
• when the RO requests additional evidence and the appellant does not respond within one year, the claim is considered abandoned under 38 C.F.R. § 3.158
• Court applied 38 U.S.C. § 5110 (b)(2), which applies to increased rating claims, to a TDIU claim
• when the RO requests additional evidence and the appellant does not respond within one year, the claim is considered abandoned under 38 C.F.R. § 3.158
• applying law governing increased-rating claims to the award of TDIU

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).