Hurd v. Hurd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a finding of “significant domestic violence” pursuant to § 13-3601 precludes an award of joint legal decision-making under § 25-403.03(A)
• holding that the appellate court does not address issues not properly raised on appeal
• holding family court cannot award joint legal decision-making by law if it finds significant domestic violence or a history of significant domestic violence
• noting that the appellate court’s “duty on review” does not include re-weighing conflicting evidence or re-determining preponderance of evidence
• stating that an abuse of discretion occurs only “when the record, viewed in the light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s decision, is devoid of competent evidence to support the decision”
• stating appellate court “must give due regard to the trial court’s opportunity to judge the credibility of the witnesses” and will not re-weigh conflicting evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).