Skip to main content
· 2/17/1998

Hur v. Department of Licensing

Citations

  • 89 Wash. App. 1027
  • 1998 Wash. App. LEXIS 3060

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding claims were unripe when allegations “of harm [were] too remote to be anything other than speculative” (quotation marks omitted)
  • dismissing case on jurisdictional grounds where appellants challenged the EPA’s approval of Missouri’s § 303(d) list because appellants’ claims of potential harm were too remote
  • “Dismissal for lack of jurisdiction is not an adjudication of the merits, thus the case must be dismissed without prejudice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.