Skip to main content
· 8/26/1991

Hupp v. Hill

Citations

  • 576 N.E.2d 1320
  • 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 1397
  • 1991 WL 166019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that immunity shielded a judge pro tempore who signed a warrant after the judge’s appointment ended
  • affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of prosecutor based on immunity grounds where prosecutor requested warrant because decision to request warrant was within scope of prosecutorial authority
  • “It is well settled that Indiana Sheriffs are not subject to the control or authority of the County Commissioners of the county in which they hold office.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Ratliff, Hoffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.