· 8/26/1991
Hupp v. Hill
Citations
- 576 N.E.2d 1320
- 1991 Ind. App. LEXIS 1397
- 1991 WL 166019
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that immunity shielded a judge pro tempore who signed a warrant after the judge’s appointment ended
- affirming grant of summary judgment in favor of prosecutor based on immunity grounds where prosecutor requested warrant because decision to request warrant was within scope of prosecutorial authority
- “It is well settled that Indiana Sheriffs are not subject to the control or authority of the County Commissioners of the county in which they hold office.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Baker, Ratliff, Hoffman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.