Huong Gilmer v. Moore Farm Owners Association, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that “there is' nothing intrinsically wrong with the use of such a technique in drafting patent claims”
• holding that the term “transparent” was definite because the disclosure, which showed that a substantial amount of infrared radiation was always transmitted even though the precise degree of transparency varied depending on certain factors, was sufficiently clear
• “[T]here is nothing intrinsically wrong with [defining something by what it does rather than what it is] in drafting patent claims.”
• \[T]here is nothing intrinsically wrong with [defining something by what it does rather than what it is] in drafting patent claims.\
• “[TJhere is nothing intrinsically wrong with [defining something by what it does rather than what it is] in drafting patent claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).