Huntt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding policy provision not in conflict with sections of Maryland’s PIP statute, which did not contain a provision similar to § 1796
• finding nothing in Maryland’s no-fault statute that would render unenforceable State Farm policy provision requiring insured to submit to a medical examination as a condition precedent to payment of benefits
• same type of clause as the one at issue here; insurer may enforce \a policy provision that is not in conflict with any statutory provision\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).